SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1746

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SNEH PRASHAR, J.
Sandeep Kumar @ Kala Singh and another - Appellants
Versus
State of Punjab - Respondent
CRA-S-755-SB-2003, CRR-1565-2003
Decided On : 08-09-2016

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.S. Sodhi, Advocate for the appellants (in CRA-S-755-SB-2003) and for respondents No.1 and 2 (in CRR-1565-2003).
For the Petitioner: Ms. Anju Arora,
For the Respondent:Mr. Surjeet Singh Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the reliance on credible identification of the accused, corroborated by recovery of stolen items, as sufficient evidence for conviction.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code - Robbery - Sections 392, 452, 323 - Summary

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a robbery where the appellants were convicted and sentenced for offences under Sections 392, 452, 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainant, Anju Bhateja, was alone at home when two unknown men forcibly entered, robbed her of gold bangles and an ear ring, and attempted to strangle her with an electric iron wire.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the appellants guilty based on the complainant's credible identification of the assailants in court, corroborated by the recovery of the stolen items from the appellants. The court also dismissed the appellants' claims of false implication and lack of evidence, upholding the conviction and the adequacy of the sentence.

Issues: The issues revolved around the credibility of the complainant's testimony, the sufficiency of evidence for conviction, and the interpretation of the injuries suffered by the complainant in relation to the charge under Section 307 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the complainant's credible identification of the appellants in court, the recovery of stolen items from the appellants, and the lack of reasonable cause for the appellants' refusal to participate in the identification parade. The court also interpreted the medical evidence to dismiss the charge under Section 307 IPC.

Final Decision: The judgment of conviction was upheld, and the appeal and revision were dismissed. The appellants' bail was cancelled, and they were to serve the remaining sentence.

JUDGMENT :

SNEH PRASHAR, J.

1. This judgment shall dispose of the appeal CRA-S-755-SB-2003 filed by appellants Sandeep Kumar @ Kala Singh and another and CRR- 1565-2003 filed by petitioner Anju Bhateja (complainant), as the same had arisen out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 07.04.2003 recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Ferozepur, in Session Case No.11 dated 11.12.2002/05.02.2001 based on First Information Report No.66 dated 05.10.2000 registered at Police Station City Fazilka whereby the appellants were held guilty and were convicted and sentenced for commission of offence under Sections 392, 452, 323 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) as under:-

Name of the convict

Under Section

Rigorous imprisonment

Fine

In default of payment of fine Rigorous imprisonment

Sandeep Kumar

392 IPC

Three years

Rs.1000/-

Three months

-do-

452 IPC

Two years

Rs.500/-

Three months

-do-

323/34 IPC

Six months

--

--

Ankur

392 IPC

Three years

Rs.1000/-

Three months

-do-

452 IPC

Two years

Rs.500/-

Three months

-do-

323 IPC

Six months

--

--

        2. It was ordered that all the sentences awarded to each of the convict shall run concurrently.

The case of the prosecution garnered from the record was as under:-

3. Smt. Anju Bhateja (complainant) was married to Ashwani Kumar son of Girdhari Lal Bhateja of Fazilka. They had two children born out of the wedlock. Both were studying. Ashwani Kumar was running a shop of Commission Agent in New Grain Market, Fazilka. On 05.10.2000, when both the children were away to school, Ashwani Kumar had gone to his shop and Anju Bhateja was alone in the house, at about 11:30 a.m., somebody rang bell of the house from outside. She opened the door and found two unknown men, one in the age group of 28-29 years and the other in 27-28 years standing outside the door. She enquired the purpose of their visit on which one of them told her that he wants to meet her husband whom he addressed as 'uncle'. She went to her drawing room to telephone her husband. In the meantime, the men entered the house and one of them caught her from her arms and the other started pressing her neck. Both of them forcibly took her in the bedroom and threw her on the bed. They snatched the four gold bangles she was wearing in her hands and also took out one gold ear topas. As she tried to raise alarm, they took up a wire of an electric iron and put the same around her neck and pressed the same. Thereafter, both the assailants ran away through the stairs of her house. She got up and came at the gate of the house. Incidentally, her husband Ashwani Kumar arrived. She disclosed the entire occurrence to him. He arranged a vehicle and brought her to Civil Hospital, Fazilka where she was medico legally examined. The weight of the snatched bangles and topas was said to be 4.5 tolas which had been given to her by her parents at the time of marriage.

4. The occurrence was reported to the police. On the statement (Ex.P16) of the complainant, First Information Report (Ex.P19) was registered under Section 382/34 IPC. Investigation commenced. On 06.10.2000, Section 397 IPC was added to the case. On 08.10.2000, when Sub Inspector Prem Kumar alongwith his official companions and Ashwani Kumar were present near the gate of Grain Market, appellants Sandeep Kumar and Ankur were arrested. During interrogation, appellant Sandeep Kumar suffered a disclosure statement, in pursuance of which he got recovered two gold bangles concealed by him near the wall of cremation ground. Appellant Ankur also suffered a disclosure statement and on the basis of the same got recovered two gold bangles lying concealed by the side of the tower near Kashi Park, Fazilka. One iron cutter was also recovered from appellant Sandee





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top