SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1591

SNEH PRASHAR
Sunder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. N.C. Kinra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Ashok Muthreja, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

SNEH PRASHAR, J.

1. This appeal was preferred by appellants Sunder Singh and Hawa Singh, assailing the judgment of conviction dated 18.03.2004 and order of sentence dated 19.03.2004 recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhiwani, in Session Case No.63 dated 20.12.2001 based on First Information Report No.149 dated 28.05.2001 registered at Police Station Sadar, Dadri, by virtue of which they (appellants) were sentenced as under:-      

Name of convict

Under Section

Sentence

Hawa Singh

186 IPC read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “IPC”).

 

307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC

 

 

 

 

 

332 IPC read with Section 34 IPC

 

 

 

 

 

342 IPC read with Section 34 IPC

 

353 IPC read with Section 34 IPC

 

452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for a period of two months.

 

 

Rigorous imprisonment for a period of seven years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-. In default of payment of fine convict shall further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months.

 

 

 

Rigorous imprison



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top