Manmohan vs State of Haryana - 2016 Supreme(P&H) 1220

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1220

M.JEYAPAUL, SNEH PRASHAR
Manmohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Tapan Kumar Yadav, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Kapil Aggarwal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

SNEH PRASHAR, J.

1. The appellant, having been convicted and sentenced for commission of offences under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code (for short, “I.P.C.”) vide judgment and order dated 17.04.2003/18.04.2003 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Gurgaon, had filed the instant appeal. The sentence awarded to the appellant was under:-

Sr. No.	Under Section	Sentence
1.	498-A IPC	Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of six months.
2.	304-B IPC	Imprisonment for life.

It was ordered that the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.

The relevant facts garnered from the record are recapitulated hereunder:-

2. Complainant Giasi Ram had five daughters and three sons. His daughter Anila (since deceased) was married to Manmohan, an Army personnel on 08.03.1997. In his complaint Ex.PA given to the police on 04.10.1999, Giasi Ram stated that he had given dowry consisting of valuable articles lik

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1220

M.JEYAPAUL, SNEH PRASHARManmohan – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

M.JEYAPAUL, SNEH PRASHAR
Manmohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent