SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2068

DARSHAN SINGH
Roop Chand – Appellant
Versus
Sukhdev Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.K. Singla, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

DARSHAN SINGH, J.

The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 11.03.2013 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jalandhar, vide which the appeal filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree dated 23.05.2009 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. Division), Phillaur, has been dismissed.

2. Appellant-plaintiff Roop Chand filed the suit for recovery of Rs. 10 lacs as damages/ compensation on account of malicious prosecution by the respondents-defendants.

3. As per averments in the plaint, appellant-plaintiff went to United Kingdom (U.K) some years back and used to occasionally visit India. He used to work and earn his livelihood in United Kingdom (U.K). Defendant no.1 and 3 filed civil as well as criminal caes against the plaintiff regarding his ancestral property with mala fide intention to cause him loss of reputation, mental agony and to bear unnecessary litigation expenses in addition to the travelling expenses from United Kingdom (U.K) to India and back. To achieve their evil designs they even pressurised the plaintiff to abandon his claim regarding his ancestral property situated at Village Rurka Kal





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top