SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1233

DARSHAN SINGH
Bimal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Guljinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

DARSHAN SINGH, J.

The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment and decree dated 17.08.2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 08.02.2013 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Ludhiana, has been dismissed.

2. For the sake of convenience, the status of the parties is being mentioned as in the original suit.

3. The appellant-plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration to the effect that he is owner in possession of land measuring 5B-13-B-6B Pukhta, comprised in Khewat no. 148, 181, 255, Khatauni No. 179, 214, 294, Khasra No.943, 924/1, 945, 944 as per jamabandi for the year 2004-2005, situated at Village Lohara Hadbast no. 260, Tehsil and District Ludhiana. In consequential relief, he has sought the decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant-respondent from alienating and further interfering in peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the property in dispute.

4. As per the averments in the plaint, the land in dispute was owned by Shardha Nath Chela Shri Hukam Chad being Ba-itamam of Khuhi Partape Wali, Village Lohara Tehsil and District Ludhiana. Shri Sha










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top