AMIT RAWAL
Vinod Kumar Mahajan – Appellant
Versus
Jagdev Kaur – Respondent
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. The appellants-defendant Nos.5 and 6 are aggrieved of the concurrent finding of fact whereby the suit for partition and rendition of account relating to SCO No.273, Sector 35-D, Chandigarh and for declaration that the power of attorney alleged to have been registered on 14.08.1996 before the Sub Registrar, U.T., Chandigarh Ex.DW10/B has been decreed by drawing preliminary decree and the agreement to sell, irrevocable General Power of Attorney and the Will alleged to be executed and registered in the office of Sub Registrar of Chandigarh on 14.08.1996 had been held to be result of fraud, forgery and impersonation, much less, no bearing on the rights, title and interest of the plaintiff to the extent of 1/3rd share in the suit property, in essence, the documents to the extent of 1/3rd share of the plaintiff have been set aside and she had been held to be owner to the extent of 1/3rd share in the suit property and held entitled for its partition and rendition of account.
2. Mr. Vikas Bahl, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Parvinder Singh, Advocate and Ms. Japneet Kaur, Advocate appearing for the appellants in support of his arguments submitted that the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.