AMIT RAWAL, J.

1. This order of mine shall dispose of two sets of Regular Second Appeals, one set at the behest of Haryana Urban Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as “HUDA”), and another set of Regular Second Appeals bearing Nos. 6089 and 186 of 2015 and cross objections No.35 to 37-C of 2012 are at the instance of the landowners, whose land had been acquired and had been denied the allotment on the ground of oustee quota.

2. For the sake of convenience, the facts are being taken from RSA No.2915 of 2012.

3. The HUDA is aggrieved of the decreetal of the suit, whereby, it has been directed to release the free-hold residential developed plot of 50 square yards in view of the fact that the land of the owner was acquired for the purpose of development of Sectors 19 and 20 of HUDA, Kaithal.

4. The case set out by the plaintiff before the Court below was that she was absolute owner in possession of the land measuring 225 square yards being 15/1518 share out of total land measuring 37 kanals which had been acquired by the defendants for development of Sectors 19 and 20 of HUDA, Kaithal. The plaintiff pleaded that defendants in terms of policy dated 18.03.1992 reserved c