Amol Rattan Singh, J.

CM No.7737-C of 2016

By this application, the legal representatives of respondents no.4 and 6, are sought to be impleaded in their place as respondents, in view of the fact that both the aforesaid respondents, i.e. Smt. Parwati, respondent no.4 and Smt. Chandro, respondent no.6, are stated to have died during the pendency of the proceedings before the Courts below.

Consequently, deletion of the names of the aforesaid respondents has also been prayed for.

Though normally, notice would be issued to the other respondents in such application, however, since eventually the appeal itself is being dismissed, as would be seen, I see no reason to disallow the application. Consequently, the application is allowed, subject to all just exceptions and the persons named in paragraph no.3 as the legal heirs of respondents no.4 and 6 respectively, are ordered to be impleaded in their place and the memo of parties annexed with the appeal, is accepted as it is, since it is already reflecting the names of legal heirs of both respondents no.4 and 6, at the relevant place.

RSA No. 2871 of 2016

1. This is the second appeal filed by the sons/legal representatives of the first de