GURMIT RAM, J.

This appeal is preferred by abovesaid appellants-herein (defendants) for setting aside the impugned judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts below and further to dismiss the suit filed by respondent-herein (plaintiff) before the learned trial Court.

2. The facts in brief of the suit as presented by respondent-herein (plaintiff) before the learned trial Court were that she was the owner of the land in dispute measuring 21 kanals 4 marlas situated in village Dera as detailed in headnote of the plaint. Defendant-Kundan Lal, the predecessor of the appellants-herein challenged the allotment made in favour of Darshan Singh, grandfather of respondent-herein (plaintiff) by initiating various litigation. In LPA Nos. 320 and 465 both of the year 1988, this Court rejected his plea wherein he challenged the allotment made in favour of said Darshan Singh vide judgment dated 09.09.2004. The operative part of the judgment was also mentioned in the plaint and there is no need to mention the same herein in detail. Resultantly, CWP No.5013 of 1985 filed by Kundan Lal in this regard was dismissed and order of learned Single Judge passed in this writ petition was also se