AMIT RAWAL
Tulli Ram – Appellant
Versus
Fateh Singh @ Fatehbir – Respondent
AMIT RAWAL, J.
1. The appellants-defendant Nos.1 & 2 are aggrieved of the judgment and decree of both the Courts below, whereby the suit seeking specific performance of agreement to sell dated 18.09.2000 executed by alleged attorney-holder Gulab Singh, whose attorney cancelled on 03.10.2000, has been decreed while exercising the discretion under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (hereinafter called 'the 1963 Act').
2. Mr. Amit Jain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants-defendants submits that the appellants-defendants had executed a General Power of Attorney dated 06.09.2000 in favour of their cousin Gulab Singh, who breached the trust and entered into an agreement to sell dated 20.09.2000 with one Om Parkash. Before the aforementioned act could fructify into sale deed, GPA was cancelled vide cancellation deed dated 03.10.2000, yet the agent exceeded the jurisdiction and executed a sale deed dated 05.10.2000. The aforementioned act of the agent was challenged by filing the suit which was decreed vide judgment and decree dated 29.04.2005. The appellants-defendants was flabbergasted, upon receiving upon summons of the suit seeking specific performan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.