Amol Rattan Singh, J.

These are three appeals filed by the plaintiff against different respondents, arising out of three different suits filed by him before the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Yamuna Nagar, in which he sought decrees of declaration that he is a co-owner of the land as detailed in the plaints, by first declaring that the sale deeds dated 17.09.1966 are illegal, null and void and not binding upon the rights of the appellant-plaintiff, and do not create any right in the respondent-defendants.

The suits and the first appeals filed by him having been dismissed, these second appeals have been filed before this Court.

Upon specific query to learned counsel for the appellant, he has submitted that three different suits were filed in view of the fact that the suit land had been alienated to different persons (the respondents-defendants in these appeals/their predecessors-in-interest), though all three sale deeds were executed on the same date, i.e. 17.09.1966.

Consequently, it has been submitted that other than the fact that the three different s