FATEH DEEP SINGH, J.

1. The above detailed three petitions, all under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking invocation of the inherent powers of this Court for quashing impugned orders dated 10.09.2014 (Annexure P1) whereby an application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. moved on behalf of one of the accused was allowed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad. The petitioners in CRM-M No. 33440 of 2014 namely Bishan Bansal, Vinod Jindal, Rajesh Singla and Nanak Chand Tayal being Directors-cum-Owners of M/s SRS Real Estate Private Limited (in short, ‘the accused Company’); in CRM-M No. 33441 of 2014 Ajay Sahni Structural Engineer and in CRM-M No. 33442 of 2014 Vijay Gautam and Ajay Gautam Architects, were summoned as additional accused for offences under Sections 337, 338, 304 (Part II) and 34 IPC and aggrieved over which these petitions by these three sets of petitioners have come into being. Challenge having arisen out of the same very order passed in one and the same case pertaining to consanguinity as to facts and involving similar questions of law, are thus being taken up and disposed off co-jointly by this common judgment which will also bring about brevity.

2. Aft