SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2195

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, RAMENDRA JAIN
Milkha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Punjab Mandi Board – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.S. Rekhi.

JUDGMENT :

RAMENDRA JAIN, J.

Petitioner was allotted plot No.511, Mandi Bhagatanwalla, Amritsar City, vide allotment letter dated 09.03.2007 (Annexure P-1). As per allotment letter, total price of the said plot was fixed at Rs. 21,60,000/-, out of which a sum of Rs. 5,50,000/- was paid by the petitioner and balance amount of Rs. 16,10,000/- was to be paid in six instalments. However, the petitioner failed to pay the balance amount of Rs. 16,10,000/- on account of inter se litigation between the petitioner and other legal heirs upon the death of his father. Consequently, aforesaid plot of the petitioner was ordered to be resumed vide order dated 08.09.2014 (Annexure P-2). Against the order dated 08.09.2014, petitioner filed an appeal before the Secretary, Punjab Mandi Board. During the pendency of appeal, petitioner was allowed to deposit the balance amount. However, petitioner failed to deposit the balance amount, therefore, the appeal was dismissed vide order dated 25.02.2015 (Annexure P-3).

2. Hence, by way of present writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order date









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top