Vinod vs State of Haryana - 2016 Supreme(P&H) 2301

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2301

SHEKHER DHAWAN
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Sushil Gautam
For the Respondent-State: Mr. Munish Dev Sharma

JUDGMENT :

SHEKHER DHAWAN, J.

Present revision is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.09.2006 passed by learned Presiding Officer, Special Environment Court, Faridabad, whereby the petitioner was convicted and sentenced as under:-

Under Section	Sentence	In default
Section 377 IPC	to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-	To further undergo RI for one month.

2. The appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad, vide judgment dated 13.03.2007 and as such, the present revision petition before this Court.

3. Relevant facts for the purpose of decision of this revision petition; that matter was reported to the police that on 17.1.1997, at about 3.30 PM, Budh Ram son of Ram Chander sent his sons Kishan Lal and Dharmender [victim], aged about 6 years, to look after the wheat in the fields. At about 4.30 PM, complainant Budh Ram along with his brother, Sohan Pal was going to the fields and observed that his son Kishan Lal was rushi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2301

SHEKHER DHAWANVinod – AppellantVersusState of Haryana – Respondent

SHEKHER DHAWAN
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent