SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2401

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
CBSE – Appellant
Versus
Mohit – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Nitin Kant Setia, Advocate

Amol Rattan Singh, J.

This is an appeal by the Central Board of Secondary Education, after the suit seeking declaration and consequential mandatory injunction, filed by respondent no. 1 herein, was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Meham, but the appeal filed by the plaintiff before the first appellate Court, was allowed by that Court and the plaintiffs' suit decreed in his favour.

2. The facts, as taken from the judgments of the learned courts below, are that the plaintiff, who was a minor at the time of institution of the suit on 08.09.2014, sought a decree of declaration to the effect that his date of birth is 11.11.1997 and not 11.11.1999 and as such, he was entitled to get his actual date of birth recorded in the records with the present appellant, as also with the school from which he passed his examination, i.e. defendant no. 3, Adarsh Senior Secondary School, Madina, Tehsil Meham, District Rohtak (present respondent no. 2).

He also sought a decree of mandatory injunction directing the first three respondents, i.e. the present appellant as also its Controller of examinations, and the school aforesaid, to issue him the certificate of having completed his se



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top