KULDIP SINGH, J.

1. The petitioner was working as a General Manager with the Oriental Bank of Commerce (in short 'OBC') and superannuated on 30.9.2010, vide order dated 5.7.2010 (Annexure-P-1). After one year of the retirement, the petitioner was served with a chargesheet dated 7.10.2011 (Annexure-P-2). The petitioner challenged the said chargesheet dated 7.10.2011 by way of filing the writ petition i.e. CWP No. 10692 of 2012, titled as A.K. Tangri Versus Oriental Bank of Commerce and others, before this Court. The said writ petition was dismissed on preliminary hearing by this Court, vide order dated 1.11.2012 (Annexure-P-5) and this Court refused to interfere in the said chargesheet dated 7.10.2011 on the ground that the inquiry is already pending. Thereafter, the inquiry officer was appointed and the inquiry was initiated. In the inquiry, charge No. 1 was partly proved and charge No. 2 was proved. The competent authority i.e. the disciplinary authority, Chairman and Managing Director, vide order dated 23.7.2013 (Annexure-P-8), impose a cut of 20% on the monthly pension of the petitioner for a period of two years. The petitioner preferred an appeal against the said order