SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
S.S.SARON & DARSHAN SINGH, JJ.
Wardi Chand and others – Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRA-D-260-DB of 2011(O&M)
Decided On : 16-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. R.S.Malik, Advocate, Mr.K.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate, Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Randhir Singh, Addl.AG. Haryana, and Mr. S.S.Pannu, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana, with Mr. Kiran Kumar, Senior Scientific Officer, NDPS (now Assistant Director, NDPS, FSL) Madhuban and SI Har Narain, Police Station, City Panipat

The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural requirements under the NDPS Act, the integrity of evidence, and the discretion to consider leniency in sentencing based on individual circumstances.

Headnote:

NDPS Act - Conviction under Section 18 - 18 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 18 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were found guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 18 of the NDPS Act for possessing opium without a permit. The conviction was based on the recovery of opium from the appellants' vehicle following a secret information tip-off.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the conviction of the appellants under Section 18 of the NDPS Act, finding no legal infirmity in the conviction recorded by the trial court. However, the court modified the sentence, considering the appellants' previous custody and lack of prior convictions.

Issues: Violation of mandatory provisions of Section 42 of the NDPS Act, discrepancy in the weight of sample parcels, and lack of independent witnesses at the time of recovery.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found no violation of Section 42 of the NDPS Act, upheld the integrity of the sample parcels, and deemed the absence of independent witnesses as not discrediting the prosecution's version.

Final Decision: The conviction under Section 18 of the NDPS Act was upheld, and the appellants were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years, with a fine of Rs. 1 lac each.

JUDGMENT :

DARSHAN SINGH, J.

The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants mentioned above against the judgment of conviction dated 13.01.2011, vide which they have been held guilty and convicted by the learned Judge, Special Court, Panipat for the offence punishable under Section 18 of The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'NDPS Act') and the order of sentence dated 15.01.2011, vide which they were ordered to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of thirteen years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,50,000/- each and in default thereof, they were further ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year each.

2. In nutshell, the facts giving rise to this prosecution are that on 07.01.2009, Inspector Jagdeep Singh (PW-7), the Investigating Officer of the case received the secret information that accused-appellant no.1-Wardi Chand, accused-appellant no.2-Balbir, accused-appellant no.3-Trilok, accused-appellant no.4-Kuldeep, accused-appellant no.5-Vikas (now deceased) travelling in Qualis vehicle bearing registration no. RJ-24-C-1987 were carrying contraband in huge quantity. The said vehicle was roaming around Panipat City and they can be apprehended if the 'Nakabandi' is held. On receiving this information, the Investigating Officer entered the Daily Dairy Report no. 6 dated 07.01.2009 Ex.PW-6/A (for short 'D.D.R'). The said information was conveyed to DSP Randhir Singh (PW-8) through EHC Raj Kumar.

3. Inspector Jagdeep Singh along with other police officials started in the Govt. Sumo vehicle bearing registration no. HR-06-N-6798 in search of the said Qualis vehicle and the persons named in the secret information and also for laying the Nakabadi in the area of Police Station, City Panipat. The Nakabandi was held near G.T. Road opposite, the under construction Mini Secretariat, Panipat. After about one hour the Qualis vehicle bearing registration no. RJ-24-C-1987 was spotted coming from the side of bus stand, Panipat. The said vehicle was got stopped by the police party. All the four persons sitting on the rear seat of the vehicle and the driver of the said vehicle were apprehended. The driver of the vehicle disclosed his name as Tirlok. The persons sitting on the middle seat disclosed their names as Wardi Chand and Balbir. The persons sitting on the rear seat disclosed their names as Kuldeep and Vikas. One big size plastic box was lying in between the persons sitting on the middle seat and the another plastic box was lying in between the persons sitting on the rear seat. The Investigating Officer suspected some contraband contained in those plastic boxes. He served a notice under Section 50 of the NDPS Act (Ex.PW6/B) upon the accused-appellants giving an option to them to get their personal search and search of the bags conducted before any Magistrate or Gazetted Officer. They opted their personal search and search of their bags to be taken in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. The Investigating Officer telephonically informed (PW-8) DSP Randhir Singh, City Panipat. After 15 minutes, he reached at the spot. The Investigating Officer disclosed the facts of the case to him. DSP Randhir Singh also disclosed his identity to the accused-appellants. Thereafter, he gave a written direction Ex.PW6/D to the Investigating Officer to conduct the search of all the five persons and of the two big size plastic boxes. The said boxes were found containing opium. The opium was shifted to two big size polythene bags and they were found containing 10 kg 850 gms opium each. Out of the said opium, 2/2 samples of 50 gms opium each from each polythene bag were separated. The samples of the opium were kept in four empty small plastic boxes ('Dibbi's). The remainder opium was put in the same plastic containers. All the four sample parcels and both the boxes containing remainder opium were kept in the sealed parcels and were sealed by the Investigating Officer bearing seal impression 'SS'. DSP Randhir Sing











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top