SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 203

ANITA CHAUDHRY
Satish Kumar Malik – Appellant
Versus
Videocon Industries Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Deepak Girotra

JUDGMENT :

ANITA CHAUDHRY, J.

CM-5757-C-2016

1. For the reasons set out in the application, same is allowed as prayed for and delay of 14 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

RSA No.2197 of 2016

2. This is the defendant's second appeal against the judgment rendered by both the Courts below

3. The suit for recovery of Rs.5,62,987.84/- was decreed. Interest @ 8% was allowed from the date of filing of the suit till realization.

4. The plaintiffs are in the business of manufacture and sale of home appliances and electronic gadgets. The defendant used to purchase and sell their electric goods under the name and style of M/s. Paras Electronics. The defendant was the sole proprietor. The goods manufactured by the plaintiff were taken on credit by the defendant, however, he failed to make some payments and a sum of Rs.5,62,987.84/- was outstanding. The defendant was erratic in the payments and several cheques issued by him were dishonoured. The defendant had been proclaiming that he was facing financial constrains and had promised to pay the dues but failed to honour the commitment made by him. It was pleaded that the defendant with an ulterior motive filed a suit for rendition of accounts and




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top