SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 528

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, RAMENDRA JAIN
Mamta Rani – Appellant
Versus
Sonu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Jaswinder Singh Grewal

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.

1. In the instant appeal, the appellant-wife has challenged the judgment and decree dated 3.9.2016 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fazilka, whereby the petition filed by her under Section 13 (wrongly mentioned as Section 13A in the heading of the petitioner) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short “the Act”) for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce, was dismissed.

2. Put shortly, the facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal as narrated therein may be noticed. The marriage between the parties was solemnized on 14.6.2003 at village Razi Ka Kalan, Tehsil and District Bathinda, according to Hindu rites and rituals. The parties lived together as husband and wife and cohabited as such. Out of the said wedlock, two sons, namely, Sahil and Shantu were born. The respondent maltreated the appellant for bringing less dowry and demanded more dowry in the shape of cash amount of Rs. 2 lakhs. He in connivance with his family members caused mental as well as physical cruelty to the appellant and gave severe beatings to her. He was addicted to intoxicants. On 18.5.2014 and 2.10.2014, the appellant was turned out of her matrimonial ho
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top