AMIT RAWAL, J.

1. Reply filed on behalf of the State is taken on record.

2. The present writ petition is at the instance of the senior citizens-petitioners, aged 80 and 75 years respectively, challenging the order dated 04.04.2016 (Annexure P-23) rendered by the District Magistrate relegating them to the pending civil suit instituted by respondent Nos.1 and 2 i.e. son and daughter-in-law of the petitioners, claiming declaration/right in the property on the first floor namely 196, 197-B, Ranjit Avenue Amritsar.

3. Mr. Sudeep Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioner No.1 is a practicing lawyer at Amritsar and had been a President and Secretary of the District Bar Association. The aforementioned property by virtue of sale deeds (Annexures P-2 and P-3) are in his ownership. The son-respondent No.1 was married with respondent No.2 in the year 1993 and out of the wedlock, one son and two daughters are born. Petitioners have another two married daughters, one settled at Canada and another at Patiala.

4. He submits that owing to the circumstances explained in the writ petition, which I do not deem appropriate to mention on the premis