SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2608

REKHA MITTAL
Amit Arya – Appellant
Versus
Kamlesh Kumari – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Anurag Jain, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vivek Suri, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J. - The present regular second appeal has been directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.04.2013 passed by the Additional District Judge, Panchkula whereby an appeal preferred by the respondent against the judgment and decree dated 14.05.2011 passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Panchkula has been partly allowed and as a result, the suit of the appellant for specific performance of agreement to sell has been dismissed and he has been granted alternative relief for recovery of earnest money along with interest.

2. Facts relevant for disposal of the present appeal are that the respondent entered into an agreement to sell dated 11.12.2004 for sale of property measuring 2 biswas 10 biswasi situated in Hadbast No. 393 Khata No. 68/119, Khasra No. 223/6 to the extent of ¼th of total 1 kanal 10 marlas situated in Kalka, Tehsil Kalka District Panchkula. Out of total sale consideration of Rs.9,05,000.00, an amount of Rs. 1,00,000.00 was paid as an earnest money at the time of execution of the agreement. The last date for execution of sale deed was fixed as 10.03.2005. It was agreed that in case the respondent failed to get the sale deed






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top