DAYA CHAUDHARY
Veena Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral):- The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 04.02.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal, whereby, the application moved by the appellant for releasing the vehicle bearing Registration no.HR-05R-1360 which has been taken into possession by the police, in case, FIR No.80 dated 02.05.2010 registered under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 IPC at Police Station Madhuban, has been dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the accused in that case have been acquitted of the charge vide judgment dated 20.03.2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karnal but the vehicle of the appellant is lying with the police and its condition is deteriorating day by day. Learned counsel further submits that no purpose would be served by keeping the vehicle in police station. He also submits that the application moved by the appellant has been dismissed only on the ground that an appeal has been filed against the judgment of acquittal, whereas, as per report of the Registry, no appeal has been filed except the present one in the aforesaid FIR.
3. Learned counsel for the respondent-State has not dispu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.