Mr. Paramjeet Singh, J.:- This is an avoidable and unfortunate litigation between father, son, daughter-in-law and others.

2. This judgment shall dispose of CWP No. 17351 of 2015 titled “Savita Sharma and others vs. District Magistrate and others” and CWP No. 17352 of 2015 titled “Mukesh Sharma vs. District Magistrate and others” as challenge in both the writ petitions is to order dated 09.07.2015 (Annexure P/5) passed by respondent no.1 – District Magistrate, U.T., Chandigarh whereby petitioner – Mukesh Sharma-son has been directed to vacate house No. 2092, Sector 37-C, Chandigarh and Shed No. 36, Rehri Market, Sector 23, Chandigarh under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). C.W.P. No. 17351 of 2015 has been separately filed by wife of Mukesh Sharma and his children.

3. I had the occasion to deal with almost the identical dispute in Ashwinder Singh and another vs. Bhagwant Singh and another, [2014(4) Law Herald (P&H) 3553] : 2014(3) R.C.R. (Civil), 906. It would be apposite to reproduce relevant paragraphs:-

“This unfortunate regular second appeal is a poignant reminder of decaying so