SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2692

REKHA MITTAL
Surinder Saini – Appellant
Versus
Simmi Saini – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J.: - The present petition directs challenge against order dated 03.11.2016 (Annexure P1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Hoshiarpur whereby application (Annexure P7) for examining handwriting and finger prints expert in rebuttal evidence has been disallowed.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed a suit for declaration claiming ownership of the property in dispute being the sole legal heir of Smt. Chanan Kaur on the basis of Will dated 24.04.2000. The petitioner adduced evidence in support of her claim set up in the plaint. Simmi Saini-respondent No. 1 examined handwriting expert Shri Arvind Sood to prove Will dated 01.02.2001 and also got produced bank records containing thumb impression of Smt. Chanan Kaur and the handwriting expert prepared a report on the basis of comparison of disputed thumb impression of Smt. Chanan Kaur in the register of deed writer dated 01.02.2001 and thumb impression available in the bank record. It is argued that as the bank record was produced before the Court in the course of evidence adduced by respondent No. 1, there was no occasion for the petitioner/plaintiff to get compare






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top