Mr. G.S. Sandhawalia, J.: (Oral)- The petitioner-tenant is aggrieved against the eviction order passed by the Appellate Authority, Sirsa dated 15.11.2014 on the grounds of material alternation of the demised premises without the consent of the landladies/respondents.

2. It is the case of the respondent/landladies that respondent was inducted as a tenant in the one ‘khan’ of shop by the previous owner and predecessor in interest of the appellants, namely, Om Parkash who had newly constructed the entire building of which the shop is a part comprising eight shops and the residential area. The tenant had executed a rent note dated 15.07.1980 and the period of tenancy was from 14.07.1980 to 13.10.1980 @ Rs.500/- per month, which was increased to Rs.1,000/- per month. They had become the owners of the shop in question through decree against Om Parkash their father and the tenant’s status had became of a statutory tenant under the payment of the said amount and he was continuing in possession.

3. Resultantly, the eviction petition was filed on 17.05.2002 for arrears of rent from 01.10.1999 alongwith the issue of material impairment and value of the shop in question on account of