SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 808

M.JEYAPAUL, DEEPAK SIBAL
Manjeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jagwinder Singh @ Raju – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Applicant:Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. M. Jeyapaul, J.: - Aggrieved by the acquittal of accused-respondents No.1 to 7 under Sections 148, 323, 307, 427 and 506 IPC, accused-respondent No.1 Jagwinder Singh @ Raju under Section 25 of the Arms Act, respondent No.1 accused Jagwinder Singh @ Raju and 7th respondent-accused Amritpal Singh under Section 336 read with Section 149 IPC, the complainant has filed the present application under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to file an appeal.

2. It is the case of the prosecution that on 8.11.2010 at about 9.30 a.m., when PW1 Manjeet Singh, who was the complainant, was standing along with his aunt Surinder Kaur and Surinder Singh outside his house near his gate, accused Kamaljit Singh and Jagveer Singh armed with gandasis, accused Raju and Amritpal Singh armed with rifle, accused Harnek Singh and Sikander Singh armed with baseball bats and accused Hari Singh armed with kirpan, came along with 10 unidentified persons in front of the gate of his house. Accused Harnek Singh and Hari Singh raised a lalkara that Manjeet should not be allowed to go scot-free. PW1 Manjeet Singh tried to lock the door. Accused Sikander Singh gave a baseball bat blow with an intention to kil








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top