SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 951

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Shingora Textiles Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Mimaki Engineering Company Ltd. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.S. Sobti, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The plaintiff is in revision petition against the order passed by the learned trial Court rejecting the plaint qua defendant No.4.

2. The plaintiff filed a suit and impleaded the following defendants:–

“1. Mr. Vinod Nayyar, Managing Director, Mimaki Pvt. Ltd., 232, Phase IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana India.

2. Mr. Sumit, Marketing Head, Mimaki Pvt. Ltd., 232, Phase IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana India.

3. M/s. Mimaki Pvt. Ltd., 232, Phase IV, Udyog Vihar, Gurgaon, Haryana India through its Director.

4. M/s. Mimaki Engineering Company Limited, 2182-3, Saigeno-OTSU, TOMI CITY NAGANO, JAPAN.

5. Mr. Akira ikeda, Chairman.

6. Mr. Hisayuki Kobayashi, President.

7. Mr. Sakae Sagane, Executive Vice President.

8. Mr. Masaki Fujita, Senior MD.

9. Mr. Nobuyuki Kimvura, Director.

10. Mr. Shintaro Imaia, Director.

All C/o M/s. Mimaki Engineering Company Limited, 2182-3, Saigeno-OTSU, TOMI CITY NAGANO, JAPAN.”

3. The plaintiff had made the following prayer in the suit: –

“Suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to replace the defective printing machine for inkjet textile processing unit being marketed under the name and style of TX400-180-B Inkjet printer













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top