AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, AMIT RAWAL
BPTP Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.
1. This order shall dispose of CWP Nos. 9858, 9836, 9852 & 9854 of 2017, as according to the learned counsel for the petitioner(s), the issue involved therein is identical.
2. Separate written statements on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2 in CWP Nos. 9858 & 9852 of 2017 have been filed in Court today and the same are taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Learned State counsel submits that the preliminary objections taken in the aforesaid two written statements would also govern fate of CWP Nos. 9836 and 9854 of 2017 as well, as the order impugned in all the four writ petitions are identical. However, the relevant facts are being extracted from CWP No. 9858 of 2017.
4. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the challenge has been laid to the notice dated 24th January, 2017 (Annexure P-4). The challenge has also been laid to the order dated 30th January, 2017 (Annexure P-6) partially to the extent there are certain observations noticed against the petitioner, whereas, the respondent-authorities have failed to decide all the issues/objections raised by the petitioner vide letter dated 27th January, 20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.