SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1160

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, ANIL KSHETARPAL
Ravinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shangara Singh, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.

1. In this writ petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 12.2.2016 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.3 vide which her claim for appointment against land user looser quota has been rejected. Further, a writ of mandamus has been sought directing respondents No.1 and 2 to offer appointment to the petitioner being eligible as no other family members have got the job against the land looser quota.

2. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for adjudicating the instant petition as narrated therein may be noticed. The father of the petitioner was owner of the land comprised in khewat No. 66, khatauni No. 338, khasra Nos. 331 (0-7), 332 (0-12), 333 (1-6). The said land was acquired vide notification dated 18.5.1981 (Annexure A-1) issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a public purpose, namely, for setting up of Diesel Locomotive Components Workshop and residential colony at Jhill, Tafazalpur, Rasulpur Saidan and Alipur, Tehsil and District Patiala. The award was passed on 11.8.1981 (Annexure A-2) wherein it








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top