SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1195

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Pardeep Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. R.K. Doon, Asstt. A.G

JUDGMENT :

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

1. This petition had initially come up for hearing on 18.09.2017 along with CWP No.22983 of 2014 (Sunita Devi vs. State of Haryana & ors.) and CWP No.24437 of 2013 (Kulwinder Singh & ors. vs. State of Haryana & ors.), in which the same issue was involved. On that date, i.e. 18.09.2017, Kulwinder Singh's case was allowed by this Court, with the direction to the respondents to offer him an appointment as a Jail Warder, on the ground that the posts advertised in the category of Ex-Servicemen (ESM), remained unfilled and therefore, those in the waiting list from the General Category/the vertical reservation category in which the horizontal reservation for ex-servicemen had been made, had a right to be appointed in terms of the instructions of Haryana Government dated 04.04.2014.

2. It had been noticed by this Court that the stand of the respondents was that since the selection process in question had started before the issuance of the aforesaid instructions, the petitioner would have no right to appointment in terms of those instructions.

3. That contention has been rejected by this Court, holding that once the Government has taken a decision during the val








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top