SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1286

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Jagan Nath – Appellant
Versus
Hari Kishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. A.K. Pathania, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. B.K. Bansal.

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The defendant-appellant has filed this Regular Second Appeal against the concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below.

2. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 09.04.1983 with respect to half share of House No.582, Sector-8B, Chandigarh constructed on a plot of 5 marlas and for permanent injunction restraining the defendant Jagan Nath from receiving and collecting the rent regarding the aforesaid house from Amar Nath, tenant son of the plaintiff.

3. The defendant filed a counter claim seeking declaration that the defendant is owner and landlord in possession through his tenant Amar Nath son of the plaintiff. The defendant further sought a relief of permanent injunction restraining the plaintiff or anyone else from interfering with peaceful possession of the defendant through his tenant.

4. The plaintiff and defendant are brothers.

5. As per the agreement to sell dated 09.04.1983, the defendant had agreed to sold the half share of house in question for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,00,000/-, received Rs.80,000/- as earnest money, delivered the actual and physical possession of his shar













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top