AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

This is the second appeal of three out of the four defendants in a suit instituted by respondents no. 1 and 2 herein (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs), seeking specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 04.12.2003, stated to have been executed by the late defendant no. 1 (Hari Singh, hereinafter referred to as the first defendant), in favour of the second plaintiff, i.e. respondent no. 2 herein, Ram Krishan.

The plaintiffs also sought a decree of possession of the suit property, after specific performance of the agreement aforesaid.

Respondents no. 3 to 6 in this second appeal are seen to be the LRs of the first defendant, Hari Singh, who died during the pendency of suit itself, as is discernible from the memo of parties before the learned Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Patiala. Thus, respondent nos. 3 to 6 have been impleaded as proforma respondents in this appeal.

2. The facts averred by the plaintiffs in their suit, are being taken from the judgments of the learned Courts below. As per the plaintiffs, the first defendant being the owner in possession of the suit property, i.e. a plot of land measuring 408 square yards, located at Sarhind R