SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1609

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Lajwanti – Appellant
Versus
Bhago (deceased) through her LRs – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K.S. Sidhu with Mr. M.S. Brar.
For the Respondent: Mr. Hardeep Singh.

JUDGMENT :

CM No. 9221-C of 2017

Allowed, as prayed for.

Documents namely translated copy of the mutation register and translated copy of the statement of the plaintiff which are part of the trial court record, are permitted to be brought on record, subject to all just exceptions.

CM No. 14522-C of 2012

Allowed, as prayed for.

CM No. 14523-C of 2012

This is an application filed under Order 41 Rule 27 read with Section 151 CPC for permission to lead additional evidence. The appellant wants to produce copy of the application submitted to the Tehsildar and a copy of the sale deed executed by plaintiff during the pendency of the present appeal. An application for additional evidence can be allowed only if the appellant is able to satisfy the requirements of Order 41 Rule 27 CPC. A reading of the application would show that the application does not meet with the requirements. Hence, application is dismissed.

Main Case

1. The defendant-Lajwanti Devi has filed the present Regular Second Appeal against the judgment passed by the learned District Judge, Patiala accepting the appeal filed by the
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top