SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1656

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Shimla Rani – Appellant
Versus
Manoranjan @ Manoranjana Randhawa – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Puja Chopra, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The present appeal is at the behest of the defendants being aggrieved of the plaintiff's suit for possession and consequential relief of permanent injunction being decreed by the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the learned courts below.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties are being referred to as per their original position in the civil suit.

3. The facts, as stated in the plaint, are that a suit for possession of house comprised in khewat/khata No. 422/658 bearing khasra No. 8799/8347/7934/2607 (0-10) situated within the revenue estate of village Banur, Tehsil Rajpura, District Patiala, and suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from alienating, transferring or raising any type of construction in the suit land, was filed.

4. The plaintiff was a house wife and her husband had retired from Indian Army as a Colonel. The plot in question was previously owned by Shri Ram Lal, who sold the same to Shri Harminder Singh vide sale deed dated 02.08.1985. Harminder Singh executed a power of attorney on 16.11.1987 in favour of Shri Sukhbir Singh Randhawa. The general power of attorney of Harminder Singh executed a sale deed dat




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top