SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1729

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Rohit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
UHBVN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Pawan Kumar Longia, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

AMOL RATTAN SINGH, J.

1. By this petition, the petitioner is seeking compassionate appointment as an Assistant Lines Man or a similar post, on account of the death of his father on 01.02.2002, while serving as an Assistant Lines Man.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, being a minor at that stage, could not have applied for the post and therefore applied for the post in the year 2004, upon which a letter was written to him by the Managing Director of the respondent-Corporation on 18.10.2004 (Annexure P-1), informing him that “the facility of employment on compassionate grounds is being provided in order of seniority and as on date, we have given appointment under Class-IV category upto 1.5.1999. Your case relates to the period 1.2.02, and will therefore be decided on its turn in accordance with the seniority.”

3. Thereafter, the Managing Director again informed him vide a letter dated 22.12.2005, Annexure P-2, that in terms of the Haryana Compassionate Assistance to the Dependents of Deceased Government Employees Rules 2003, his case for employment was to be finalized within a period of 3 years, either from the date of issuance of the rules, or
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top