SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1789

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Mamta Devi – Appellant
Versus
Inderjeet Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Himanshu Puri, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J.

1. The grievance in the present appeal is against the dismissal of MACT Petition No. 13 of 11.3.2014 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gurgaon (for short 'the Tribunal').

2. In the alleged motor vehicular accident, which occurred on 16.11.2013, Ajay Kumar s/o Jeet Singh, lost his life. He was driving his motor cycle bearing registration No.HR-26-AM-1286 which was hit by the offending vehicle bearing registration No.HR-47-B-3243

3. The claim petition under section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') was filed by the claimants.

4. The legal position with regard to claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Act has been duly settled by Hon'ble the Apex Court in

5. Hon'ble the Apex Court in Reshma Kumari and others Versus Madan Mohan and another, 2013 (9) SCC 65, held as under:

''10. The 1988 Act gives choice to the claimants to seek compensation on structured formula basis as provided in Section 163A or make an application for compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) of Section 165 under Section 166. The claimants have to elect one of the two remedies provided in Section 163A and Se







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top