SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 2797

REKHA MITTAL
Kulvinder Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Tawar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner (in both the petitions):Mr. Kanwardeep Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Rekha Mittal, J.:- This order will dispose of CR No.6480 and 6525 of 2016 as identical questions of law and fact are involved for adjudication. For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from CR No.6480 of 2016.

2. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that Dalbir Singh and others filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief of permanent injunction claiming them to be owner in possession of suit property and the suit was filed against Gurbachan Kaur and Gurvinder Kaur (minor). In the said suit, Gurbachan Kaur and Gurvinder Kaur filed a counter-claim for possession of suit land. The suit filed by Dalbir Singh and others and counter-claim preferred by Gurbachan Kaur and another were ordered to be dismissed by the trial Court vide judgment and decree dated 15.06.2009.

3. Gurbachan Kaur and Gurvinder Kaur preferred an appeal against the aforesaid judgment and decree and the Court of Additional District Judge, Fast-track Court, Karnal allowed the appeal in respect of counter-claim preferred by Gurbachan Kaur and Gurvinder Kaur vide judgment and decree dated 20.01.2012 (Annexure P6). On the basis of the decree passed by the Court of appeal, an application for













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top