SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 1936

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Rajbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ved Parkash – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant:Mr. Ram Bilas Gupta, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J.: - The present regular second appeal has been filed by appellantplaintiff-Rajbir Singh to challenge impugned judgments and decrees passed by both the Courts below.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case as made out in the present appeal are that the appellant-plaintiff filed a civil suit for permanent injunction restraining the respondent-defendant from dispossessing him unlawfully and forcibly from the suit property. The claim of the appellant-plaintiff was based on the agreement to sell dated 24.5.1997 alleged to have been executed by the respondent-defendant in his favour. The suit was contested by the respondent-defendant by way of filing written statement-cum-counter claim. The suit of the appellant-plaintiff was dismissed and the counter claim of respondent-defendant was decreed to the effect that the plaintiff is restrained from interfering in peaceful possession of the defendant over the suit property and from dispossessing him illegally. The judgment and decree dated 23.8.2013 passed by the trial Court was challenged by the appellant- plaintiff by way of filing an appeal before the learned Additional District Judge, Faridabad, which was also dism






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top