SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2023

DAYA CHAUDHARY
Amrinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Seerat Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. I.S. Saggu, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mrs. Daya Chaudhary, J.:- The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside impugned order dated 26.10.2016 passed by District Judge, Family Court, Faridabad to the extent that the petitioner has been directed to be present in person at the time of recording second motion statement in mutual consent divorce petition No. HMA 1312/27.10.2016 filed under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage Act and for granting exemption from personal appearance and to allow Special Power of Attorney holder, namely, Sh. Bhagwan Singh to appear, act and make statement on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Briefly, the facts of the case, as made out in the present petition are that petitioner got married to respondent on 10.2.2013 according to Sikh rites and rituals. They remained together for sometime but thereafter they could not pull together in their married life. FIR No. 129 dated 7.6.2014 was registered at Police Station Faridabad NIT against the petitioner and his parents. Subsequently, the dispute between the parties was amicably settled vide compromise deed dated 16.5.2016 with the intervention of the respectables of the Society and family members, wherein, it was mutually agreed















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top