SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2049

AVNEESH JHINGAN
Kamal Kant – Appellant
Versus
Balwant Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Neeraj Khanna, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. R.N. Singal, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Avneesh Jhingan, J.:- The present appeal has been filed against the award dated 8.5.2009 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ambala (for short ‘the Tribunal’).

2. The brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal are noted below:

3. On 6.2.2008 Kamal Kant was driving his motor cycle bearing registration No. HR-01-M-4605 and Rakesh Bagga, was a pillion rider. When they reached near Polytechnic Chowk near Ambala City, they were allegedly struck by Maruti Van bearing registration No. HR-01-H-7477. As a result of the accident, the appellant suffered fracture on his right leg. He was shifted to Civil Hospital, Ambala City and then referred to PGIMER, Chandigarh, but he was taken to Mahandiratta Hospital, where he remained admitted for 7-8 days for treatment.

4. The claim petition was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the Act’), which has been dismissed by the Tribunal.

5. Aggrieved of the said award, the present appeal has been filed.

6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book.

7. Learned counsel for the appellant argued that there is no dispute that the accident took place and the ap









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top