SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2106

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Ram Saroop Walia – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vikas Cuccria, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, J. (Oral):- The petitioner has challenged the order of the District Magistrate, Panchkula, dated 12.09.2017, by which his application filed under Section 22(2) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) has been dismissed.

2. In brief, the petitioner is a senior citizen and respondent no.3 is his daughter-in-law, against whom he has filed the application for seeking her eviction from his house, which is allegedly owned by him.

3. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has even disowned his son Vivek Walia, husband of respondent no.3, who is causing a lot of inconvenience to him while living in the same house and, therefore, he had filed the application for her eviction in order to live rest of his life in peace.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and examined the available record with his able assistance.

5. The application by a senior citizen under Section 22(2) of the Act is not maintainable against the daughter-in-law if the husband of that woman is alive. The reason is very simple as the application under Section 22(2) of the Act has to be fil




Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top