SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 101

M.M.S.BEDI, GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Ashu – Appellant
Versus
Ashok – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sandeep Lather, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Kanhiya Soni, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

1. The appellant Ashu (wife) assails order dated 12.1.2017 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Jind, whereby an application filed by her under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') seeking custody of her minor child namely Daksh has been dismissed and she has been granted visitation rights only to meet her minor son on every Saturday/Sunday between 10 A.M. to 1 P.M. at residence of her husband or at the hospital, after seeking permission from the doctor concerned.

2. A few facts, necessary to notice for disposal of this appeal, are that marriage of the parties was solemnized on 23.4.2015 and a child namely Daksh was born out of the wedlock on 6.4.2016. However, differences having crept in the relationship of the parties, the respondent-husband filed a petition under Section 13 of the Act seeking dissolution of his marriage with the appellant. Since the minor son was staying with respondent, the appellant moved an application under Section 26 of the Act seeking custody of minor son.

3. The appellant, in her application under Section 26 of the Act averred that she is natural guardian of her minor













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top