S.J.VAZIFDAR, HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Innovative Techno Park Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged an order dated 01.04.2016 issued by respondent No.2 and an order dated 19.05.2017 passed by respondent No.1 and has sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to permit it to utilise its land and buildings for all purposes and in the manner permitted to institutional buildings in similarly zoned sectors developed by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA).
2. Respondent No.1 is impleaded through the Financial Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana. Respondent No.2 is the Urban Local Bodies Haryana. Respondent No.3 is the Director General, Town & Country Planning, Haryana. Respondent No.4 is the Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, Haryana. Respondent No.5 is the Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA).
3. The case in essence is this. In the Development Plan, the petitioner’s land falls under the category:-
“600 PUBLIC AND SEMI PUBLIC USE
610 MINI SECRETARIAT, JUDICIAL COMPLEX, JAIL POLICE STATION AND OTHER INSTITUTIONS
620 EDUCATIONAL, CULTURAL, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS
630 MEDICAL AND HEALTH INSTITUTIONS
640 CULTURAL INSTITUTIONS LIKE THEATRES, OPERA HOUSES ETC. OF NON-COMMER
Kamaraji Venkata Krishna Rao v. Sub Collector, Ongole and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.