AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Khatta Singh – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. Chandigarh – Respondent
Augustine George Masih, J.
CRM-36245-2017
1. Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Reply on behalf of respondent-CBI is taken on record.
CRM-40212-2017
2. Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Filing of certified/typed copies of Annexure R-7/1 to R-7/22 is dispensed with and the same are taken on record.
CRM-40373-2017
3. Application is allowed subject to just exceptions. Filing of certified/true typed copies of Annexure R-2/1 to R-2/2 is dispensed with and the same are taken on record.
CRR-3592-2017 (O&M)
4. By this order, I propose to decide two revision petitions i.e. CRR No. 3592 of 2017 titled as Khatta Singh vs. C.B.I. Chandigarh and others and CRR No. 274 of 2018 titled as Khatta Singh vs. C.B.I. Chandigarh and others, preferred by Khatta Singh, who appeared as a Prosecution Witness No. 31 in RC No. 8 and RC No. 10, CBI vs. Baba Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and others challenging the order passed by the learned Special Judge (CBI) Haryana at Panchkula dated 25.09.2017 in RC-8(S)/2003/CBI/SCB/CHG., dated 09.12.2003 under Sections 302/120-B/506 IPC and order dated 06.01.2018 in RC-10(S)/2003/CBI/SCB/CHG. Dated 24.07.2008 under Sections 302/307/120-B IPC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.