IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
M.M.S. BEDI, GURVINDER SINGH GILL, JJ.
RAMANDEEP KAUR - Appellant
Versus
AMANPREET SINGH - Respondent
FAO-M-358 of 2014 (O&M)
Decided On : 12-02-2018
Fraud - Divorce - Section 14 of Hindu Marriage Act - 14
Fact of the Case:
The wife obtained an ex parte decree of divorce, claiming fraud and violation of Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which prohibits filing for divorce within one year of marriage. The appellant alleged that the respondent obtained the divorce decree within one year by playing fraud on the court and her.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the divorce decree obtained within one year of marriage was contrary to the mandatory provisions of law and set it aside. The court also noted that there is no estoppel against the statute and that fraud vitiates all actions.
Issues: The issues involved the validity of the divorce decree obtained within one year of marriage, the plea of fraud, and the applicability of Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that there is no estoppel against the statute, and fraud vitiates all actions. It also emphasized that statutory provisions cannot be violated even by mutual consent of the parties.
Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the judgment and decree dated 06.05.2014 were set aside. The court clarified that the judgment would not prejudice the parties' rights to seek divorce in accordance with the law, as the one-year period had expired.
M.M.S. BEDI, J.
1. The wife had obtained ex parte decree of divorce vide judgment and decree dated 06.05.2014.
2. The appellant has filed this appeal claiming that a fraud has been played upon her as well as on the Court. It is averred in the grounds of memorandum of appeal that she married with the respondent on 31.05.2013 after running away from her house. Initially, both families opposed the marriage, but they married with a hope that families would reconcile. The appellant claims that she was being humiliated by her in-laws and they used to spoil the mind of respondent against her, as the family members of the respondent entered into an conspiracy to get rid of her. The respondent in a clever manner asked the appellant to stay in a paying guest accommodation at Dabwali, District Sirsa, with the promise that he would keep visiting her and he would satisfy the ego of his family members. During her stay in the paying guest at Dabwali, District Sirsa, the entire expenses were borne by the respondent. The divorce petition was filed in the Court to satisfy his family members with an understanding that same would be withdrawn in the midway. The divorce petition was got filed before the trial Court on 28.02.2014 whereas the date of marriage was mentioned in the petition as 31.05.2013. The statutory bar of Section 14 of the Hindu Marriage Act does not permit any Court to entertain a petition for dissolution of marriage before expiry of one year from the date of marriage.
Section 14 of Hindu Marriage Act reads as follows;
14. No petition for divorce to be presented within one year of marriage.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, it shall not be competent for any court to entertain any petition for dissolution of a marriage by a decree of divorce, {unless at the date of the presentation of the petition one year has elapsed} since the date of the marriage: Provided that the court may, upon application made to it in accordance with such rules as may be made by the High Court in that behalf, allow a petition to be presented {before one year has elapsed} since the date of the marriage on the ground that the case is one of exceptional hardship to the petitioner or of exceptional depravity on the part of the respondent, but if it appears to the court at the hearing of the petition that the petitioner obtained leave to present the petition by any misrepresentation or concealment of the nature of the case, the court may, if it pronounces a decree, do so subject to the condition that the decree shall not have effect until after the {expiry of one year} from the date of the marriage or may dismiss the petition without prejudice to any petition which may be brought after the {expiration of the said one year} upon the same or substantially the same facts as those alleged in support of the petition so dismissed.
(2) In disposing of any application under this section for leave to present a petition for divorce before the {expiration of one year} from the date of the marriage, the court shall have regard to the interests of any children of the marriage and to the question whether there is a reasonable probability of a reconciliation between the parties before the expiration of the {said one year}”.
3. In context to the above said provisions of law, we have seen the impugned judgment and decree. The date of marriage is mentioned in the petition as 31.05.2013, whereas, the date of filing of the divorce petition is 28.02.2014 and even ex parte decree of divorce was also passed within a period of one year. Although the appellant-wife had herself filed petition in contravention to the provisions of law, but it is settled principle of law that there is no estoppel against the statute and against any action done in contravention to the statutory provisions and the same cannot be legalized even by consent. By mutual consent of a party the statutory provisions cannot be permitted to be violated. The respondent being ex parte, the plea of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.