SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 358

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
Nishi Bhargava – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of Punjab and Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Nishi Bhargava, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.

1. The petitioner is a practicing Advocate at Hisar who has preferred this petition to challenge the order dated 31.03.2018 passed by respondent No. 2 (Returning Officer of District Bar Association, Hisar) by which she has been informed that she is not eligible to cast her vote in the forthcoming elections for having been enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh vide enrolment No. HIM/69/1985.

2. The brief facts of this case are that the petitioner, after obtaining the Degree in Law from the Himachal Pradesh University, Shimla in the year 1985, got herself enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of Himachal Pradesh, having enrolment No. HIM/69/1985. After her marriage in the year 1993, the petitioner has settled at Hisar and has started her legal practice at the District Courts, Hisar after becoming the member of the District Bar Association. It is alleged that she has been casting her vote in all the previous elections of the office bearers of the District Bar Association but in the forthcoming elections, which are scheduled to be held on 06.04.2018, she has filed her nomination papers to contest for the post of Vice-Presi

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top