Rajesh Bindal, J.

1. Aggrieved against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, the appellant has preferred the present appeal.

2. The writ petition was filed claiming the following reliefs:

“(a) Issue a direction to entrust the investigation of case arising from FIR No. 90 dated 23.6.2017, Police Station, Faridabad, District GRP Ambala Cantt., under Section 323, 324, 302, 34 IPC (Annexure P/1) to an independent agency, like Central Bureau of Investigation;

(b) Issue appropriate writ, order or directions to the respondents for providing adequate and appropriate security to the petitioner, his family and the prosecution witnesses in view vulnerability and the nature of the crime;

(c) Issue appropriate writ, order or direction to the Ld. Trial Court to stay the proceedings during the pendency of the present petition;

(d) to (i) xx xx xx”

3. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petition. It is the aforesaid judgment, which has been impugned in the present intra-court appeal.

4. At the very out-set, learned counsel for the State, while referring to the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Ram Kishan Fauji v. State of Haryana and others, (2017) 5 SCC 533, raised a prelimin