SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(P&H) 512

AMOL RATTAN SINGH
Rishi Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Sheoran

JUDGMENT :

Amol Rattan Singh, J.

By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of an order/communication dated 30.04.2012 (Annexure P-4 with the petition), by which his claim for appointment on compassionate basis, to a post in the respondent bank, has been rejected, informing him that the Financial Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary to the Government of Haryana, Department of Cooperation (respondent no.1 herein), had intimated the petitioner that the “matter has been filed after consideration”.

The petitioner consequently further seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus by way of a direction to the respondents, to consider his case for appointment in terms of the 'ex-gratia scheme' promulgated by the Government of Haryana (stated to be applicable to the respondent bank also), in view of the fact that vide a resolution dated 31.01.1995 (copy Annexure P-1), passed by the Board of Directors of the bank (respondent no.4), it had been resolved that the application of the petitioners' mother, reserving the right of her son for such appointment, should be accepted.

2. The background to the matter is that the father of the petitioner, Sultan Singh, was working as an Establishment Officer/Juni















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top