SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2325

SURINDER GUPTA
Jeet Singh – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate with Harparteek Singh Sandhu, Advocate
For the Respondent:S.S. Sandhu, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Surinder Gupta, J.

This is appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 31.01.2004 passed by Special Judge, CBI, Punjab at Patiala, whereby the appellant was convicted for the offence under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) punishable under section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short-P.C. Act) and sentenced as follows:-

Sr. No.

Under Section

Sentence.

1.

7 of P.C. Act.

Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

2.

13(1)(d) punishable under section 13(2) of P.C. Act.

Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for three months.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that appellant Jeet Singh was working as mechanic in Telecom Department, Moonak, District Sangrur. Complainant Jagtar Singh son of Charan Singh (PW1) moved an application for installation of CCB (Coin Collectio
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top