RAKESH KUMAR JAIN
NITIN GARG – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.02.2016 by which his passport has been revoked.
2. In brief, the petitioner was issued passport No. A-8845342 on 12.06.2000 by the Regional Passport Office (RPO), Chandigarh. He travelled to the United States of America (USA) on this passport in 2003. He got married to Neha Garg in October, 2006. He stayed with his wife Neha Garg in USA for about 4 years. The petitioner was re-issued passport No.J-1172253 dated 26.04.2010 in lieu of his earlier passport No.A-8845342. At the time of renewal, the petitioner did not disclose the name of his wife and, thus, it was not included in his passport No.J-1172253. The petitioner, along with his wife, came back to India in August, 2010 on passport No.J-1172253 but after a few weeks, he returned to USA and is there since then. Neha Garg, wife of the petitioner, lodged FIR No. 144/2012, under Sections 498A, 406, 506 & 34 of the IPC at Police Station, Sirsa City against the petitioner, her parents-in-law, sister-in-law and two others. She also made a complaint to the RPO, Chandigarh to issue show cause notice to the petitioner, as a result of which, show cause notice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.